Lame
Image
goinggreen

Share this Broadcast

share

Subscribe to this author

subscribe

Message This Author

contact

Star this author

stars

Subscribe

subscribe

Groups, Browse, or Search
Image

The Great Diaper Conundrum

Image Posted by goinggreen Posted on: 04/29/08

The Great Diaper Conundrum

The debate about disposables versus cloth diapers has long raged among environmentalists. Disposables end up in land fill. Cloth diapers require water and chemicals to wash. Which is worse on the environment? Now a team of Dutch researchers have answered the question by looking at the energy and waste lifecycle of both. That is to say that where previous studies have looked at the environmental impact of each once they were purchased by the consumer, this new study accounts for the resource use, production and transportation, for each kind of diaper.

The answer is, drum roll please, it is better to go with cloth! Now for those of you that are thinking cloth are inconvenient, I used cloth and it has not only environmental advantages, but children tend to get potty trained much earlier. According to the study, children use an average of 5000 diapers and are usually potty trained at 3.2 years of age. My daughter was potty trained just after she turned 2. And it wasn't difficult training either. We put a little potty in the bathroom, she would try to use it. Then one day we were driving back to New Hampshire from Boston. She said she had to go to the bathroom. She was wearing a diaper but she didn't want to go in it. We got home, she used the potty and that was the end of the diapers. So while the cloth diapers were occasionally inconvenient, my diaper changing days were also over much more quickly.

According to one of the authors of the study, "Although multi-useable diapers need to be washed, which also puts a strain on the environment, we found that washable diapers are up to seven times better for the environment than single-use diapers."

Seven times better for the environment and faster, easier potty training, made from a renewable resource (cotton). As in so many things, turns out what worked for our grandparents, great grand parents and great great grandparents is the way to go.

Links
  • Image
    cereals said on 29 Apr 18:02
    I've been thinking about this ever since you wrote your repair or replace article, and this article makes me think of it again. Currently, all the light bulbs in my house are the "old type." I want to switch to the new, more environmentally friendly ones, but I feel as if I should wait until the ones I am using burn out first. Is this a good strategy to go with, or should I just toss out the un-frinedly, but still perfect functional bulbs for more environmental ones? Thanks : )

  • Image
    goinggreen said on 29 Apr 18:07
    This is something I have grappled with, as well. My suggestion is this - for lights that are on for long periods of time, such as outdoor lights that may be left on all night or the main lights in your house, make the switch immediately. You will save energy use and money. For lights that you use infrequently, wait for the bulbs to burn out and then replace them with energy efficient CFL bulbs. This is kind of the best of both worlds since those conventional bulbs that you have took energy to make and money to buy and you don't want to waste them. Hope that helps!

  • Image
    cereals said on 29 Apr 19:06
    thanks! you always give such helpful advice : )


about us | contact | terms | privacy | advertise | help | press | feedback